There's no javax classes in the source-xref
	http://stax.codehaus.org/maven/xref/index.html
...

paul


Le 26 janv. 05, à 12:48, jastrachan@mac... a écrit :

> The API and RI for StAX are here...
>
> http://stax.codehaus.org/
>
>
> On 26 Jan 2005, at 11:39, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 26 janv. 05, à 11:57, jastrachan@mac... a écrit :
>>>> But there's one big problem here: stax-api uses javax.xml package 
>>>> (just as saaj does) which is, precisely, something that needs 
>>>> endorsed directory!
>>>
>>> Really? I though only java.* was locked down in applets? (You learn 
>>> something new every day)
>>
>> Now... you seem to be right.
>> I need to make tests but that would solve, simply all my fears!
>> I would love javax again!
>>
>>>> How can we solve this ?
>>>> Is there a stax distribution that has a different package naming?
>>>> Would the license of stax allow such a change ?
>>> I'm not sure. Technically a tool could take the stax/wstx code and 
>>> xmlbeans and activesoap and swizzle all the package names to 
>>> something else - but that seems an awful lot of work to go. Is an 
>>> 'endorsed directory' a show stopper for you?
>>
>> Scriptwriting for this doesn't sound too evil but I fear the license 
>> doesn't allow it.
>> Where is a home page related to the JCP of StAX which provides a 
>> downloadable jar of the javax.xml.stream interfaces java classes 
>> along with a license, hopefully a classic one.
>> I always bangged my head against the wall for JAXP which never really 
>> made it I think, I'd like to avoid this for StAX if possible.
>>
>> paul
>>
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>